Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Anastasia Gasanova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bjorklund vs Gasanova analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Anastasia Gasanova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bjorklund 1 - 0 Gasanova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bjorklund has won 52.82% of points on their second serve, while Gasanova has won 36.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bjorklund, in recent form, has won 55.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gasanova has won 62.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.69% and 46.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bjorklund has saved 46.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gasanova has saved 48.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bjorklund has won 61.9% of matches played (W/L 13/ 8), with Gasanova winning 58.62% (W/L 17/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 128/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22). Gasanova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 121/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 10/ 4), where as Gasanova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bjorklund winning 0 times and Gasanova being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 1 and Gasanova winning 0. The last match between Bjorklund and Gasanova was at the W60 Bronx, 19-08-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 7-5 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bjorklund and Gasanova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bjorklund winning 0 times and Gasanova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bjorklund winning 0, and Gasanova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bjorklund has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.24 while Gasanova has played against players with an average rank of 235.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bjorklund has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gasanova has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bjorklund has converted 52.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gasanova has converted 54.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
289
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
645
Rank
121
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
61% (216-138)
Career Total W/L
60% (242-159)
50% (4-4)
YTD W/L
68% (13-6)
$378,603
Career Prize Money
$78,873
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mirjam Bjorklund vs Anastasia Gasanova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bjorklund VS Gasanova
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Anastasia Gasanova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 7 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:50:0 | 0:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (25/33) | 81% (29/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 31% (9/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 13% (1/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| Return Points W% | 67% (24/36) | 55% (18/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 ret. |
Stats 
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
81%
(
29 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
55%
(
18 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Anastasia Gasanova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (4/4) | 68% (13/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 67% (29/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (62/58) | 57% (231/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.82 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 162 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:28 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 109.88 | 248.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (220/362) | 62% (759/1217) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (126/220) | 61% (463/759) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (75/142) | 36% (167/458) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (27/51) | 55% (99/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (184/393) | 53% (634/1198) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 68% (13/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 68% (13/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Gabia Paskauskas
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
11
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anastasia Gasanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
52%
(
45 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Peangtarn Plipuech
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Meiqi Guo
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Xinxin Yao
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
10
50%
(
15 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Sohyun Park
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bjorklund Vs Gasanova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bjorklund are available here and Gasanova photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
